Diferenciación funcional de la sociedad e institucionalismo centrado en el actor: construyendo una herramienta analítica para los estudios internacionales
Resumen
Considerando a los Estudios Internacionales como un complejo campo transdisciplinario, se pretende construir una herramienta analítica versátil que desde una teoría sociológica permita observar cualquier dinámica propia de las diversas interacciones desarrolladas por actores organizados a nivel mundial. Se pretende obtener dicha herramienta a través de la síntesis teórica entre la Teoría de Sistemas Sociales (TSS), en específico la teoría de la Diferenciación Funcional de la Sociedad y el Institucionalismo Centrado en el Actor (ICA) de Scharpf y Mayntz. En su desarrollo, la propuesta compara y evalúa en su compatibilidad/incompatibilidad conceptos y elementos provenientes de esas tradiciones para así construir una herramienta apropiada para ser socializada y enseñada para el análisis de políticas internacionales, con el horizonte de informarse, reflexionar, analizar y asesorar la toma de decisiones de distintos organismos incidentes en la configuración de áreas temáticas y arenas, entendidas esto como un espacio temático de bienes en disputa, en distintos niveles, que van desde lo local a lo global. A través de este ejercicio de síntesis se pretende elaborar un aparato conceptual que provea un instrumental analítico-práctico, adecuado para efectos de abordar el análisis de diversas dinámicas interactivas y de orden sistémico, propias de la sociedad mundial y sus regiones.Palabras clave:
Estudios internacionales, Ontologías científicas, Teoría de sistemas sociales, Institucionalismo centrado en actores, Teoría de juegosReferencias
Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447-465.
Aguilera, R. V., Geppert, M., & Jackson, G. (2019). Sub-theme 59: Actor-centered Institutionalism: Comparing Actors, Contexts, Interactions and Change. 35th EGOS Colloquium 2019 in Edinburgh, Enlightening the future: The Challenge for organizations. Retrieved from https://www.egos.org/jart/prj3/egos/main.jart?rel=de&reserve-mode=active&content-id=1539047741567&subtheme_id=1511424499851
Ahrne, G., Brunsson, N., & Seidl, D. (2016). Resurrecting organization by going beyond organizations. European Management Journal, 34(2), 93-101.
Albert, M. (2008). Conflict in world society theory. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 57-75.
Albert, M. (2016a). A theory of world politics (Vol. 141). Cambridge University Press.
Albert, M. (2016b). Luhmann and systems theory. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
Albert, M., Buzan, B., & Zürn, M. (Eds.). (2013). Bringing sociology to international relations: World politics as differentiation theory. Cambridge University Press.
Albert, M., Hansen-Magnusson, H., & Humrich, C. (2022). Politikwissenschaftliche polarforschung. Polarforschung, 90(2), 45-48.
Alexander, J. C. (2006). Global civil society. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2-3), 521-524.
Andersen, N. Å. (2003). Polyphonic organisations. Autopoietic Organization Theory, 151-181.
Angus, I. (2015). When did the Anthropocene begin... and why does it matter?. Monthly Review, 67(4), 1.
Arnold, M. H. Cadenas y A. Urquiza. La organización de las organizaciones sociales: aplicaciones desde perspectivas sistémicas. Santiago: RIL Editores.
Baecker, D. (1999). The form game. In D. Baecker (Ed.), Problems of form. Stanford University Press.
Bakken, T., & Hernes, T. (2003). Autopoietic organization theory: Drawing on Niklas Luhmann's social systems perspective. Copenhagen Business School Press.
Battersby, P. (2018). Problem orientation. In The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies (pp. 139).
Booth, K., & Kurki, M. (2017). Editors’ introduction: Rethinking International Relations–again. International Relations, 31(1), 68-70.
Bösch, R. (2023). Observing Conflict Escalation in World Society: Ukraine's Maidan and Mali's Breakup (p. 446). transcript Verlag.
Brandhoff, B. (2009). Autopoietic systems, not corporate actors: A sketch of Niklas Luhmann's theory of organisations. European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR), 10(2), 307-322.
Burns, T. R., Roszkowska, E., Machado, N., & Corte, U. (2021). Teoría sociológica de juego: agencia, estructuras sociales y procesos de interacción. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, (97), 57-85.
Cadenas, H. (2014). Organizaciones y grupos: loose coupling/strict coupling. In M. Arnold, H. Cadenas y A. Urquiza (Eds.), La organización de las organizaciones sociales: aplicaciones desde perspectivas sistémicas (pp. 153-170). Santiago: RIL Editores.
Chalmers, A. F. (2013). What is this thing called science? 4th Edition. University of Queensland Press.
Chávez, J. M. (2014). La estela de Leipzig. La ideología del conservadurismo alemán como motivo fundacional de la sociología de Luhmann. Elementos, 72, 3-14.
Chernotsky, H. I., & Hobbs, H. H. (2021). Crossing borders: International studies for the 21st century. CQ Press.
Colas, A. (2013). International civil society: Social movements in world politics. John Wiley & Sons.
Contreras, A. V. (2007). La organización, el sistema y su dinámica: una versión desde Niklas Luhmann. Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios, (61), 129-156.
Crubellate, J. M. (2007). Three neofunctionalist conceptual contributions to the institutional theory in organizations. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 4(1), 66-81.
Curran, S. R. (2018). Global studies versus international studies. In The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies (pp. 199).
Drepper, T. (2005). Organization and society: On the desideratum of a society theory of organizations in the work of Niklas Luhmann. In D. Seidl & K. H. Becker (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and organization studies (pp. 171-190). Malmö: Liber.
Esquivel, F. J., & Esquivel, J. A. (2015). Los nuevos paradigmas de la Teoría de Juegos desde la globalización. Revista de paz y conflictos, 8(1), 25-40.
Esser, D. E., & Mittelman, J. (2017). Transdisciplinarity. School of International Service Research Paper, (2017-3).
Eun, Y. S. (2021). Calling for “IR as becoming-rhizomatic”. Global Studies Quarterly, 1(2).
Friedman, G., & Starr, H. (2002). Agency, structure and international politics: From ontology to empirical inquiry (Vol. 2). Routledge.
Giménez Alcover, P. (1993). El derecho en la "teoría de la sociedad" de Niklas Luhmann [Microforma]. Universidad de Barcelona.
Glasius, M. (2010). Uncivil society. In International Encyclopedia of Civil Society (pp. 1583-1588).
Goddard, S. E., & Nexon, D. H. (2005). Paradigm lost? Reassessing theory of international politics. European Journal of International Relations, 11(1), 9-61. doi:10.1177/1354066105050136
Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A user's guide. Princeton University Press.
Gonnet, J. P. (2018). Orden social y conflicto en la teoría de los sistemas de Niklas Luhmann. Cinta de Moebio, 61, 110-.
Guisado, Á. C. (2016). Teoría de juegos y análisis estratégico: una revisión metodológica en torno a la toma de decisiones y el conflicto internacional. Psychology, 29(4), 511-530.
Guzzini, S. (2000). The use and misuse of power analysis in international theory. In Global political economy: Contemporary theories (pp. 53-66).
Guzzini, S. (2001). Another sociology for IR?: An analysis of Niklas Luhmann's conceptualisation of power. Copenhagen Peace Research Institute.
Guzzini, S. (2005). The concept of power: A constructivist analysis. Millennium, 33(3), 495-521.
Guzzini, S. (2013). The ends of international relations theory: Stages of reflexivity and modes of theorizing. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 521-541.
Hanke, T. (2005). Steuerung zwischen System und Akteur. Die Scharpf-Luhmann-Kontroverse. GRIN Verlag.
Hasse, R. (2005). Luhmann's systems theory and the new institutionalism. In D. Seidl & K. H. Becker (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and organization studies (Vol. 14). Malmö: Liber.
Hedström, P., & Bearman, P. (Eds.). (2009). The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology. Oxford University Press.
Hermans, L. M., & Cunningham, S. W. (2018). Actor and strategy models: Practical applications and step-wise approaches. John Wiley & Sons.
Jackson, P. T. (2008). Foregrounding ontology: Dualism, monism, and IR theory. Review of International Studies, 34(1), 129-153.
Jackson, P. T. (2010). Three stories: Revisiting the anarchist roots of realist and liberal IR theory. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1), 147-159.
Jessop, B. (1990). Regulation theories in retrospect and prospect. Economy and Society, 19(2), 153-216.
Jessop, B. (2000). The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the ecological dominance of globalizing capitalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 323-360.
Jessop, B. (2015). The state: Past, present, future. John Wiley & Sons.
Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389-401.
Joerges, B., & Czarniawska, B. (1998). The question of technology, or how organizations inscribe the world. Organization Studies, 19(3), 363-385.
Kavalski, E. (2011). On global life and world politics: A different beginning. Global Society, 25(1), 79-93.
Keane, J. (2003). Global civil society? Cambridge University Press.
Kjaer, P., & Steineger, M. (2019). Niklas Luhmann and the sociology of law. Sociologia Juridica/Sociology of Law, 6, 53-68.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.
Kouris, N. (2010). Teoría de juegos en la ciencia de la negociación. Revista de ciencias empresariales y económicas, 9(1), 5-10.
Kriesberg, L. (2007). Constructive conflicts: From escalation to resolution. Rowman & Littlefield.
Kurki, M., & Sinclair, A. (2010). Hidden in plain sight: Language, ideology and the implications of complexity. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(2), 281-298.
Levi, M. (2003). Organizing power: The prospects for an American labor movement. In I. Katznelson & A. R. Berma (Eds.), Shaped by war and trade: International influences on American political development (pp. 306-325). Princeton University Press.
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, N. (2004). Law as a social system. Oxford University Press.
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
Marín, A. J. P. (2004). La sociedad mundial. Constelaciones, 1(1), 109-123.
Martin, J. (2018). Approaches to cultural theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies (pp. 21-).
McCalla-Chen, D. (2000). Why pragmatics? In A. Seidl & K. H. Becker (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and organization studies (pp. 171-190). Liber.
Michaud, N. (2019). Exploring actor-centered institutionalism in international relations. European Political Science, 18(1), 33-47.
Mies, M. (2014). Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: Women in the international division of labour. Zed Books.
Moreno-Jiménez, J. M., & Polasek, W. (2002). Toma de decisiones en el entorno económico y social. In J. M. Moreno-Jiménez (Ed.), La evaluación multicriterio de la política económica y social (pp. 47-74). Thompson.
Newell, P., & Pattberg, P. (2010). Climate governance beyond 2012: Competing discourses of green governmentality, ecological modernisation and civic environmentalism. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 239-250). Oxford University Press.
Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (2004). The search for American political development. Cambridge University Press.
Pinto, H. R. (2009). ¿Juegos de orden o de azar?: algunas características epistemológicas de la teoría de juegos. Cinta de Moebio, 36, 2-10.
Power, M. (2016). Riskwork: Essays on the organizational life of risk management. Oxford University Press.
Pries, L. (2019). The refiguration of spaces and re-bordering of spaces in the current wave of globalisation. Global Networks, 19(3), 485-505.
Pries, L. (2022). De- and re-bordering in contemporary Europe and beyond: The re-figuration of spaces and re-bordering dynamics in the pandemic. In The COVID-19 pandemic and risks in society: Perspectives and reflections on the work of Ulrich Beck (pp. 73-83). Springer.
Puchala, D. J. (1971). Of blind men, elephants and international integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 10(3), 267-284.
Reed, M. I. (2000). The limits of discourse analysis in organizational analysis. Organization, 7(3), 524-530.
Ritzer, G. (2011). Globalization and the new social space. In R. Robertson & J. A. Scholte (Eds.), Encyclopedia of globalization (pp. 565-571). Routledge.
Ritzer, G. (2015). The McDonaldization of society. Sage Publications.
Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high-speed society. In E. Nowotny, P. B. Pendersen, & S. Nowotny (Eds.), The speed of social processes and political consequences. Brill.
Scholte, J. A. (2005). Globalization: A critical introduction. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Scholte, J. A. (2011). Global civil society. In J. A. Scholte (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Globalization (pp. 615-619). Routledge.
Scholte, J. A. (2015). Reinventing global democracy. In J. A. Scholte (Ed.), Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives (pp. 271-290). Cambridge University Press.
Scholte, J. A. (2017). Mapping the geography of global civil society. In G. Baker & D. Chandler (Eds.), Global civil society: Contested futures (pp. 15-32). Routledge.
Schwinn, T. (2008). Niklas Luhmann's theory of world society and the problem of societal differentiation. Sociological Theory, 26(4), 421-444.
Seidl, D. (2005). The basic concepts of Luhmann's theory of social systems. In D. Seidl & K. H. Becker (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and organization studies (pp. 21-53). Liber.
Shinoda, H. (2021). Examining the evolution of the world-society system. In H. Shinoda & S. Uchida (Eds.), The Evolution of the World-Society System (pp. 45-64). Springer.
Sinclair, T. J. (2010). Globalization and social change. In G. Ritzer & Z. Atalay (Eds.), Readings in globalization: Key concepts and major debates (pp. 107-116). Wiley-Blackwell.
Sinclair, T. J., & Latham, R. (Eds.). (2007). Key concepts in globalization. Routledge.
Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a new American state: The expansion of national administrative capacities, 1877-1920. Cambridge University Press.
Sørensen, M. P. (2016). STS and innovation studies: Siblings under the skin. In H. Nowotny, S. P. Turner, & P. B. Pendersen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of innovation in social research (pp. 75-89). Sage.
Stark, D. (2009). The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton University Press.
Stein, S. (2006). Niklas Luhmann's theory of world society and the problem of societal differentiation. Sociological Theory, 26(4), 421-444.
Stewart, A. (1995). Two conceptions of citizenship. The British Journal of Sociology, 46(1), 63-78.
Stichweh, R. (2013). The history and systematics of functional differentiation in sociology. In H. Joas & B. Knöbl (Eds.), Social theory: Twenty introductory lectures (pp. 127-147). Cambridge University Press.
Stichweh, R. (2015). Governance and world society. In H. Joas & B. Knöbl (Eds.), Social theory: Twenty introductory lectures (pp. 241-260). Cambridge University Press.
Therborn, G. (2000). At the birth of second century sociology: Times of reflexivity, spaces of identity, and nodes of knowledge. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 37-57.
Therborn, G. (2007). After dialectics: Radical social theory in a post-communist world. New Left Review, 43, 63-114.
Turner, J. H. (2012). Theoretical sociology: 1830 to the present. Sage.
Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/outside: International relations as political theory. Cambridge University Press.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1). University of California Press.
Weiss, L. (1998). The myth of the powerless state. Cornell University Press.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
Wiberg, H. (1981). The peaceful dispute settlement between democracies: Norwegian-Swedish relations, 1814-1905. Journal of Peace Research, 18(4), 377-390.
Wright, E. O. (2019). How to be an anti-capitalist in the twenty-first century. Verso Books.
Zürn, M. (2018). A theory of global governance: Authority, legitimacy, and contestation. Oxford University Press.
Zürn, M., & Faude, B. (2013). On fragmentation, differentiation, and coordination. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 119-130.
