Temática y objetivo

La Revista Chilena de Antropología es una revista internacional arbitrada por pares académicos que se publica dos veces al año (Julio y Diciembre) y que recibe manuscritos inéditos en español o inglés. Su objetivo es difundir y discutir la investigación en las diferentes ramas de la Antropología, con el fin de comprender los múltiples aspectos de las realidades sociales y culturales de Latinoamérica y el Caribe. Para ello, la revista recibe contribuciones de forma ininterrumpida durante todo el año.

 

Política de secciones

Editorial

Sin marcar Abrir envíos Sin marcar Indizado Sin marcar Evaluado por pares

Prólogo

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

In Memoriam

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

Introducción

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

Artículos

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

Colaboraciones

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

Antropología y Patrimonio Cultural

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

Arqueología y Bioantropología

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

I. Antropología Social

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

II. Arqueología

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

III. Etnolingüística

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

IV. Reseñas

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

IV. In Memoriam

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

Información Científica

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

Reseñas

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares

Dossier

Marcado Abrir envíos Marcado Indizado Marcado Evaluado por pares
 

Proceso de revisión por evaluadores

Los trabajos recibidos serán revisados por los Editores, miembros del Comité Editorial de la revista y por, al menos, dos evaluadores externos anónimos. Los comentarios y sugerencias de todas las instancias anteriores serán comunicados a los autores, quienes deberán responder en un plazo no mayor a las cinco semanas a tales observaciones, indicando su aceptación y/u omisión, justificando su opción en el último caso. Sobre todos los antecedentes anteriores se procede a la aceptación o rechazo del artículo. Una vez aceptados los trabajos, estos serán publicados en relación al orden del desarrollo del proceso editorial y a la afinidad con la sección temática (en caso de corresponder a manuscritos propuestos para esta área). Las contribuciones deben ser enviadas por internet a la siguiente dirección: rchant@uchile.cl. Sólo se aceptarán trabajos inéditos, independiente del idioma en que estén escrito, y que no estén en proceso de consideración en alguna otra revista. Los trabajos, referencias y figuras publicadas son de exclusiva responsabilidad de sus autores. Las opiniones expresadas en estos trabajos no reflejan necesariamente el pensamiento de la revista. Code of Conduct The journal subscribes the code of conduct for editors of COPE (Committee on Publications Ethics). 1. General duties and responsibilities. The editor is the person accountable for every article published in the journal. The editor shall strive to meet the needs of readers and authors; constantly improve the journal; ensure the quality of the material they publish; champion freedom of expression; maintain the integrity of the academic record; always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed. 2. Relations with readers. Readers should be informed about who has funded research and on the role of the funders in the research. 3. Relations with authors. Editors’ decisions to accept or reject a paper for publication should be based only on the paper’s importance, originality, and clarity, and the study’s relevance to the remit of the journal. A description of peer review processes should be published, and the Editors should be ready to justify any important deviation from the described processes. Journals should have a declared mechanism for authors to appeal against Editorial decisions. Editors should publish guidance to authors on everything that is expected of them. This guidance should be regularly updated and should refer or link to this code. Editors should not reverse decisions to accept submissions unless serious problems are identified with the submission. 4. Relations with reviewers. Editors should publish guidance to reviewers on everything that is expected of them. This guidance should be regularly updated and should refer or link to this code. Editors should have systems to ensure that peer reviewers’ identities are protected. 5. The peer-review process. Editors should have systems to ensure that material submitted to their journal remains confidential while under review. 6. Complaints. Editors should follow the procedure set out in the COPE flowchart. Editors should respond promptly to complaints and should ensure there is a way for dissatisfied complainants to take complaints further. Journal mechanism is the following: Send an email to the editor. If the situation cannot be resolved, it will pass on to the Ethic Committee of the Social Science Faculty at University of Chile (http://uchile.cl/s107053). 7. Encouraging debate. Cogent criticisms of published work should be published unless Editors have convincing reasons why they cannot be. Authors of criticised material should be given the opportunity to respond. 8. Encouraging academic integrity. Editors should ensure that research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines. Editors should seek assurances that all research has been approved by an appropriate body (e.g. research ethics committee, institutional review board). However, Editors should recognise that such approval does not guarantee that the research is ethical. 9. Protecting individual data. Editors should protect the confidentiality of individual information. 10. Pursuing misconduct. Editors have a duty to act if they suspect misconduct. This duty extends to both published and unpublished papers. Editors should not simply reject papers that raise concerns about possible misconduct. They are ethically obliged to pursue alleged cases. Editors should first seek a response from those accused. If they are not satisfied with the response, they should ask the relevant employers or some appropriate body (perhaps a regulatory body) to investigate. Editors should follow the COPE flowcharts where applicable. Editors should make all reasonable efforts to ensure that a proper investigation is conducted; if this does not happen, Editors should make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem. This is an onerous but important duty. 11. Ensuring the integrity of the academic record. Whenever it is recognised that a significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distorted report has been published, it must be corrected promptly and with due prominence. If, after an appropriate investigation, an item proves to be fraudulent, it should be retracted. The retraction should be clearly identifiable to readers and indexing systems. 12. Relations with journal owners and publishers. The relationship of Editors to publishers and owners is often complex but should in each case be based firmly on the principle of Editorial independence. Notwithstanding the economic and political realities of their journals, Editors should make decisions on which articles to publish based on quality and suitability for readers rather than for immediate financial or political gain. 13. Conflict of interest. Editors should have systems for managing their own conflicts of interest as well as those of their staff, authors, reviewers and Editorial board members.

 

Política de acceso abierto

Revista Chilena de Antropología provee acceso libre inmediato a su contenido bajo el principio de que hacer disponible gratuitamente investigación al publico apoya a un mayor intercambio de conocimiento global.

 

Archivado

Revista Chilena de Antropología utiliza el sistema LOCKSS para crear un archivo distribuido entre las bibliotecas participante, permitiendo a dichas bibliotecas crear archivos permanentes de la revista con fines de preservación y restauración. Ampliar información...